Thursday, September 29, 2011

19 Caps, 1 Cork

"Look at this - 20 wines, just one cork!"

That's what George said just before our Australian wine tasting on Saturday. Normally when we host a tasting, regardless of where the wines come from, we end up with dozens of corks strewn across the tables. Australians have embraced the use of screw-cap enclosures for a long time, much more so than wine makers in other countries, but this was really striking - just one cork! One!

So many screw-caps!
What's the reason for this? And are screw-caps better?

There are a few reasons, but the most important one, and the best argument for switching to screw-caps, is cork taint. All cork is sterilized before being used, but the sterilization process is imperfect. About 3% to 5% of all corks remain contaminated with a chemical compound known as TCA - it is harmless to humans, but ruins the wine. If your wine is "corked" - contaminated by TCA - it will either smell like nothing at all (if it is very mildly contaminated), or like a damp, moldy basement or wet socks. It's not pleasant, and it can happen to any wine with a cork enclosure - whether it's your $8 bottle of Pinot Grigio or your $200 bottle of Bordeaux. No wine is safe.

Unless you use a screw-cap, that is. Screw-caps completely side-step this issue. They provide a perfect seal to every bottle, every time. And don't believe the myth that only cheap wines come in screw-caps. John Duval, one of the great wine makers of the world, makes absolutely stunning wines in Australia's Barossa Valley, and all but one of his wines come in screw-caps.
The lone cork.

Screw-caps do have two main disadvantages, though. I once spoke to a French wine maker considering making the switch from cork to screw-cap. He told me that he had been experimenting with screw-caps for years, including aging them long-term in his cellars. He found that there were no flavor differences between wines sealed with corks and screw-caps until they'd been aged for about 8 years or so, after which point the cork-sealed wines started to perform better. So if you're planning on aging your wine long-term, cork is probably the way to go. (I'll be putting a couple bottles of John Duval's screw-capped wines in my cellar - you can read about one of them here. When I open them up in 10 years, I'll let you know how they do!)

The other disadvantage is probably the one most people are concerned with - no "pop!" A lot of people enjoy the ceremony of using a cork screw to pop open a bottle of wine, and they miss that when they drink a screw-capped wine.

The conclusion? I'm a fan - I'd much rather give up the cork popping ceremony for a guarantee that my wine won't have any defects, and almost all of the wine I buy is wine I plan on drinking within in the next six months, so cellaring isn't an issue. I've been pleased to see more and more of our customers coming around to screw-caps, too - I know some people will always want to see a cork in their bottle, but I encourage you all to at least give screw-caps a chance!

1 comment:

  1. Your article definitely provides an interesting comparison between these two wine stoppers. Well, every wine maker has their own opinion about corks and screws. But today, modern wine makers switched to screw caps because it presents a lot of advantages for their products. The main advantage is avoiding spoilage. In my opinion, it is not bad to try something new, especially if it makes the quality of your product better.

    ReplyDelete

Followers